Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Children's Policy Group and Jersey Child Protection Committee: Budget Transfer to Chief Minister's Department

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 26 November 2012:

Decision Reference:        MD-HSS-2012-0037

Decision Summary Title :

Transfer from the Health and Social Services Department 2013 – 2015 budget to Chief Minister Department monies and FTE associated with the Children’s Policy Group and Jersey Child Protection Committee

in anticipation of a transfer of political responsibility in due course.

Date of Decision Summary:

22 November 2012

Decision Summary Author:

 

Assistant Director – Ministerial Support

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

N/A

Date of Written Report:

N/A

Written Report Author:

Director Corporate Policy, Chief Ministers Department

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

N/A

Subject:  Transfer from the Health and Social Services Department (HSSD) 2013 – 2015 budget to Chief Minister Department (CMD) monies and FTE associated with the Children’s Policy Group (CPG) and Jersey Child Protection Committee (JCPC)

Decision(s): The HSSD Minister, in accordance with a decision taken by the Council of Ministers on 4 October 2012, has decided to transfer from HSSD to CMD the monies and FTE associated with the CPG and the JCPC.

Reason(s) for Decision:

To establish a Vulnerable Adults Policy Group and Jersey Vulnerable Adults Protection Committee to provide political co-ordination across Departments in relation to policies that effect vulnerable adults, and to co-ordinate safeguarding activities in order to ensure that vulnerable adults are afforded sufficient protection. In addition, and by association, to transfer responsibility for leading the CPG and the JCPC to CMD. This includes the budget and FTE for the Executive Officer for CPG and JCPC staff being transferred from HSSD to CMD. Note; although responsibility for the CPG and JCPC and budget and FTE are to be transferred to CMD, the HSSD Minister will remain as the Chair of CPG meetings until the point at which the Vulnerable Adults functions are fully established.

Resource Implications: HSSD revenue head of expenditure will decrease recurrently by £274,680 per year (£824,040 over 2013-2015 MFTP period). The CMD revenue head of expenditure will increase by the same amount. This represents £233,780 for JCPC costs plus £40,900 for CPG Executive Officer.

 

The HSSD FTE allocation will decrease by 3.45 FTE. The CMD FTE allocation will increase by the same amount. This represents 0.45 FTE for CPG executive officer; 3 FTE for JCPC staff.

 

Action required:

  1. Treasury & Resources seek the approval of the Minister for Treasury & Resources to accept the budget transfer.
  2. Treasury & Resources to transfer monies from HSSD revenue head of expenditure to CMD head of expenditure.

Signature:

 

Position: Minister for Health and Social Services

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed)

 

Children's Policy Group and Jersey Child Protection Committee: Budget Transfer to Chief Minister's Department

Establishing a Vulnerable Adults Policy Group and Jersey Vulnerable Adults Protection Committee by way of transferring budget from 2012 Central Reserves to the Chief Minister’s Department;

And;

transferring budget from the Health and Social Services Department 2013 – 2015 budget allocation to the Chief Minister’s Department in respect of the Children’s Policy Group and Children’s Protection Committee in anticipation of a transfer of political responsibility in due course.

 

This report follows on from a Council of Ministers decision to establish a Vulnerable Adults Policy Group (Section 1) and a Jersey Vulnerable Adults Protection Committee (Section 2). This has implications for the administrative functions and political lead for the Children’s Policy Group (CPG) and Jersey Child Protection Committee (JCPC), as also outlined in Section 1 and 2.

 

Financial Implications

 

 

 

Current Costs:

Children’s Policy Group (CPG) and Child  Protection Committee (JCPC)

 

Amounts to be transferred from Health and Social Services Department

Net Additional Costs:

Vulnerable Adults Policy Group (VAPG) Vulnerable and Vulnerable Adults Protection Committee (VAPC)

Amounts to be transferred from 2012 Central Reserves

Total Costs:

 

Annual Costs of Protection Committee(s)

 

 

£233,780

 

£108,370

 

£342,150

 

Executive Support Officer for Policy Group

£40,900

£50,000

£90,900

Total Annual Costs

£274,680

£158,370

£433,050

3 year costs across MTFP Period 2013 - 2015

£824,040

£475,110

£1,299,150


Section 1: Jersey Vulnerable Adults Policy Group

 

What is the VAPG?

 

The proposed VAPG is a cross departmental policy group. It would work on behalf of CoM to provide political oversight and co-ordination of issues that effect vulnerable adults, including older adults, who live in our community. It would work across, and amongst, States Department and States funded services.

 

Its primary aim would be to deliver improvements in the policies and practices that benefit vulnerable and older adults.

 

In addition, it would provide political oversight of issues relating to the protection and safeguarding of vulnerable adults and older adults, ensuring that the Chair of the proposed Vulnerable Adults Protection Committee has direct, cross-departmental political access (see Section 2). Thus the VAPG, alongside the CPG, will enable policy in relation to vulnerable adults and children to be significantly enhanced and will help ensure our Island has in place a comprehensive protection mechanism for those who need it.

 

In this way, the Group will play a key role in delivering the States’ new strategic priority to Promote Family and Community Values. In addition, it will significantly compliment the Council of Ministers’ commitment to place increased emphasis on Social Policy.

 

Terms of Reference outlining the purpose, function and membership of the VAPG are attached as Appendix 1.

 

What benefits VAPG will be deliver?

 

In May 2010 CoM formally ratified establishment of the CPG which works on behalf of CoM to ensure synergies in the way States Departments work together on initiatives that impact children and young people living in our community.

 

Since its establishment, the CPG has provided a focus for delivering and driving forward improvements in policy and practice by ensuring cross-departmental input, decision-making and problem solving. This has included, but not been limited to:

  • providing a clearly identifiable political focus for children’s issues
  • joint delivery of initiatives that previously stalled due to their cross-departmental nature (e.g.: rules limiting hours worked by school children in order to protect them from harm)
  • clarity about prospective priorities of key initiatives (e.g.: requirement of professional fostering services to benefit children in care and children in the youth justice system)
  • development of overarching outcomes for children and young people, essential for development of Strategic Framework as recommended by Williamson
  • joint political ownership of recommendations of Serious Case Review relating to multiple siblings who came to harm.

 

It is envisaged that the VAPG will, like the CPG, deliver multiple benefits improving communication and decision making for the benefit of Islanders.

 

Structure

 

It is proposed that:

 

  1. The VAPG is supported by a part time Executive Officer who will work help ensure it functions effectively and deliver its agenda in relation to older adults and vulnerable adults. (It is notable that the CPG has been able to function effectively unlike the Corporate Parent that preceded, in part, because it has had a dedicated 0.45 FTE Executive Officer funded via Williamson monies).

 

  1. The part-time VAPG Executive officer and CPG Executive Officer roles are merged to create a single full time Social Policy post for the States of Jersey. This post would be based in the Chief Minister Department.

 

  1. The VAPG sits within CMD and is chaired by the Assistant Chief Minister, Senator Paul Routier.

 

  1. It is also proposed that the CPG moves from HSSD to CMD, but does so after a staggered transition period that allows for the VAPG to ‘bed down’ within detracting from the CPG, and during this time the Minister for Health and Social Services should continue to lead the CPG supported by the Director, Corporate Policy, and Executive Officer.

 

Locating both the VAPG and CPG in CMD will help ensure that these distinct key elements of social policy, which cut across different departmental agendas, are perceived as being central to States wide social policy as opposed to being perceived as the sole or lead responsibility of any particular department. 

 

This both supports the trend of cross departmental delivery of key objectives as outlined in the States Strategic Plan and provides an additional degree of independence / appropriate distance between the policy and safeguarding functions and operational functions, which is critical to effective safeguarding.

 

Section 2: Vulnerable Adults Protection Committee

 

Why have a VAPC?

 

Jersey has an obligation to protect all vulnerable people including older people and, whilst the JCPC provides a multi-agency approach in relation to the prevention of harm to children, there are no equivalent arrangements for vulnerable adults, including older people.

 

Yet, the requirement to protect vulnerable adults is as important and will increase as:

  • our population continues to age and the proportion of people who are vulnerable and have special needs grows
  • more vulnerable people are cared for/live in an increasing number and diversity of settings (for example: institutions; their own homes; community day facilities). This trend will increase in line with the future direction of social care in Jersey as being established by the new Health Strategy, and will be supported by changes to long-term care funding.

 

Multi-agency safeguarding arrangements are as important for vulnerable adults as they are for children. They help communities strike a balance between protecting vulnerable adults from abuse, harm or exploitation and between being overly risk adverse, which can result in unnecessary use of precautionary measures that have a negative impact on the individual’s life and choices.

 

As demonstrated by the success of the JCPC, a VAPC will be able to bring agencies together to jointly problem solve and to identify and plugs the gaps between their different practices. It allows professionals to think and learn outside their organisational parameters, consider broader issues and develop effective working relationships in which people are open and transparent about their organisational weaknesses.

 

It has been repeatedly shown, via a myriad of UK reports developed in response to some of the worst cases of abuse that the lack of inter-agency working and the lack of structures that support inter-agency working are a major factor contributing factor.

 

Why it is required now?

 

Some vulnerable people in Jersey are at risk of abuse or harm. It would therefore be prudent to establish structures designed to better prevent and manage any future incidents as soon as possible.

 

It is also important to recognise that an increased emphasis is being placed on adult safeguarding by many other jurisdictions, with support from the UN.  Last year the UK government issued a new statement of government policy in relation to adult safeguarding, both clarifying the need for multi-agency safeguarding arrangements and set out its intention to create a statutory basis for adult safeguarding.

 

The VAPC in combination with the JCPG will help ensure our Island has in place a comprehensive protection mechanism for those who need it. In addition, alongside the JCPC and both the Vulnerable Adults and Children’s Policy Groups (VAPG and CPG) it will play a key role in significantly enhancing policy in relation to vulnerable adults and children. This is central to delivery of the States’ new strategic priority Promote Family and Community Values and will significantly compliment the Council of Ministers commitment to place increased emphasis on social policy.

 

What would the role of the VAPC be?

 

In Jersey, there are already adult safeguarding measures in place including those delivered by the Police, the Adults and Older Adults Social work teams plus the RAMAS risk management system in relation to mental health. There is, however, a lack of multi-agency governance, hence a potential likelihood that vulnerable adults are not afforded sufficient protection.

 

The risks faced by vulnerable adults are extremely broad, are very real and are already occurring in Jersey. They include:

  • physical and sexual abuse
  • emotional abuse
  • neglect
  • financial abuse (including: theft; improper use of funds and resources through coercion)

 

The role of the proposed VAPC would be to co-ordinate safeguarding activities between different agencies. This would include both preventative and re-active functions including:

  • investigation inc. Serious Case Reviews
  • specific initiatives to address identified harm inc. policy development; research; audit
  • education and risk management inc. training and tools/materials development
  • community awareness raising professional, service providers and wider community.

 

The aim would be to enable all adults to maintain their independence and well-being, and ensure they can live a life that is free from abuse and neglect i.e. it is not just about protecting people from harm but about upholding key principles in relation to dignity and respect; autonomy; involvement and choice.

 

It is envisaged that the terms of reference will include ensuring:

  • safeguarding and governance arrangements are fit for purpose
  • development of robust policies, procedures and protocols
  • robust monitoring of incidences of harm and initiating serious case reviews as appropriate
  • communication and engagement with staff, users, carers and the general public
  • provision of training and workforce development activities.

 

The VAPC structure would be formally agreed once the Independent Chair is in place but would likely mirror the JCPC structure, and UK safeguarding committees, and would include:

  • a shared independent Chair and delivery function (whilst maintaining separate VAPC and JCPC)
  • joint strategic and operational committee
  • sub-groups focusing on specific areas of activity e.g.: serious case reviews and training.

 

 

What is happening in the UK?

 

Some UK agencies are moving to the model of joint independent Chairs for adults and children safeguarding. The reasons for doing reflect those in Jersey:

 

  • fostering joint working to maximise learning and make best effective use of the strategic safeguarding role
  • value of money.

 

Whilst this is a relative new development and no research has been undertaken as to the impact of joint independent Chairs, SCIE[1] noted both an increased trend for joint Chairs and, where there an no joint Chairs, the increased necessity for developing structures aimed at overcoming duplication between children and adults safeguarding (for example dedicated Children/Adult Safeguarding Interface Sub-Groups) or for supporting joint learning (for example: joint subject matter sub-groups).

 

 

 

 

 


Appendix 1: VAPG Terms of Reference

 

Vulnerable Adults’ Policy Group

Terms of Reference

 

Introduction

The purpose of the Vulnerable Adults’ Policy Group (VAPG) is to provide political co-ordination across, and amongst, States Departments and States Funded Services that impact on, benefit, or protect the Island’s vulnerable adults, whether of working age or post-retirement age.

 

The Ministers of the VAPG will confer and support each other to deliver key outcomes for vulnerable adults including in relation to:

  • Health
  • Safety
  • Material well-being
  • Enjoyment and achievement
  • In making a positive contribution

 

Accountabilities

 

  1. Advise on the ongoing development and implementation of a safeguarding mechanism for vulnerable adults (Vulnerable Adults’ Protection Committee)

 

  1. Receive the Annual Report and Plan of the Vulnerable Adults’ Protection Committee prior to presentation to COM and publication

 

  1. Serious Case Reviews (SCR): VAPG to formally receive the SCR’s commissioned and undertaken by the Jersey Vulnerable Adults’ Protection Committee, including:
    1. considering recommendations
    2. working in partnership with VAPC to oversee and monitor delivery of recommendations
    3. reporting SCR findings and recommendations to Council of Ministers (COM) as appropriate.

 

  1. VAPG to advise and support relevant Ministers on policy matters in relation vulnerable adults to facilitate a joined up approach to policy for vulnerable adults.

 

  1. To work pro-actively with each other, other Departments, States Funded Services, Parochial Authorities, and other external organisations, to ensure the provision of cohesive, effective services for vulnerable adults.

 

  1. To provide strategic advice to the Council of Ministers and States Assembly on matters relating to vulnerable adults, including their carers.

 

  1. To advise and contribute to propositions to the States Assembly and formal consultation processes in order to ensure that the impact upon vulnerable adults is taken into account

 


Whilst the Ministers will act collaboratively to discharge their responsibilities in relation to vulnerable adults, each Minister retains their own statutory obligations as set out in Law.

 

Membership

The members of the VAPG include:

  1. The Assistant Chief Minister, Senator Paul Routier, Chair
  2. Minister for Health and Social Services
  3. Minister for Home Affairs
  4. Minister for Housing
  5. Minister for Social Security

 

With advice and support from:

  1. Independent Chair, VAPC
  2. CEO, Health and Social Services
  3. CO, Home Affairs
  4. CO Housing
  5. CO Social Security
  6. Director, Corporate Policy

 

Other Ministers and Officers may be invited as relevant.

 

Secretariat

Central Policy Unit, Chief Minister’s Department

 

Meeting cycle

Quarterly


[1] Social Care institute for excellence

Back to top
rating button