Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Brexit Funding: Consultancy Support

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 3 October 2017:

Decision Reference: MD-E-2017-0035

Decision Summary Title :

Draw down of dedicated Brexit funding from Treasury

Date of Decision Summary:

18 September 2017

Decision Summary Author:

 

Head of Service, EDTSC 

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Draw down of dedicated Brexit funding from Treasury

Date of Written Report:

26 September 2017

Written Report Author:

Head of Service, EDTSC 

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject: Brexit

 

Decision(s): The Minister decided to draw down dedicated Brexit funding to procure consultancy support and provide additional resources for capacity in the context of the trade, agriculture and fisheries portfolios. 

Reason(s) for Decision: To provide the necessary additional capacity to enable Jersey to negotiate the most favourable possible outcome for Jersey in the UK’s negotiations to exit the EU.

Resource Implications: Up to the sum of £125,000 pa in 2017 and 2018 from the EPGDP as set out in the report.

Action required: Head of Service to request draw down of funding from Treasury.

 

Signature: Senator L J Farnham

Position:

Minister for Economic Development, Tourism, Sport and Culture

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed)

 

Brexit Funding: Consultancy Support

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TOURISM, SPORT AND CULTURE

Draw down of dedicated Brexit funding from Treasury

Purpose of the Report

To provide the rationale for the Minister to request draw down dedicated Brexit funding from the Treasury to provide the necessary additional capacity to enable Jersey to negotiate the most favourable possible outcome for Jersey in the UK’s negotiations to exit the EU in the context of trade, agriculture and fisheries.

Background

In the light of the decision on 23rd June by the UK electorate to leave the EU, a core Jersey Brexit team has been formed, which draws in and co-ordinates with Ministers, Chief Officers, advisers, and officials from across government. In conjunction with other departments, the External Relations team has undertaken a detailed look at the call on resources that will be needed to manage Jersey’s engagement in Brexit, both in terms of immediate needs, and having the resources available to deal with requirements as the negotiations progress.

It is vital that Jersey is included in discussions before and throughout the process of negotiating the UK’s withdrawal, and that in any new relationship with the EU our position and interests are taken into account.

 

The Government of Jersey has been in regular contact with the UK Government on these matters at both Ministerial and official level thus far and are keen to ensure that this continues in the months and years ahead.

 

A successful Brexit both for the UK and Jersey will need to be based on the continuation of the fundamentals of the relationship between the UK and Jersey; these fundamentals include, inter alia, the perpetuation of:
 

  • monetary union with the UK with freedom of movement of capital
     
  • freedom of movement of people between the Channel Islands and the UK without formal border controls in (a recognisable version of) the Common Travel Area
     
  • freedom of trade within a Customs Union with the UK
     
  • external trade on the basis of external tariffs in common with the UK

 

  • constitutional autonomy, including our ability to set our own fiscal policy.

 

 

Jersey has, along with the other Crown Dependencies, established with HMG priorities for the negotiating strategy which includes trade, agriculture and fisheries.

Ministers have acknowledged that new resources would be needed to protect and promote Jersey’s interests. Ministers agreed that the Economic Productivity and Growth Drawdown Provision (EPGDP) would be the most suitable channel for funding which has been approved.

These new funds will be used to enable Jersey a) to negotiate the most favourable possible outcome for Jersey in the UK’s negotiations to exit the EU, and b) to broaden and deepen commercial and political relationships with non-EU global markets in the future.

Jersey’s current relationship with the EU and the UK includes:

a) free trade in goods with the UK and EU Member States, including agricultural products (that is, trade unrestricted by tariffs or quantitative measures, while accepting the need to meet certain standards, such as those relating to specific products or the environment).

b) our non-EU (“third country”) status for trade in services with EU Member States, including existing third country equivalence rules and treatment for access to EU markets for financial services.

c) de facto monetary union with the UK, which enables us to move capital freely between Jersey and the UK, and between Jersey and EU Member States via the UK.

d) the Common Travel Area and the free movement of people between Jersey and the British Isles and Ireland.

e) provisions for the employment and housing of those who come to Jersey to work.

f) constitutional autonomy, including our ability to set our own fiscal policy.

Details

Agriculture and fisheries sectors and a range of associated trade issues will be directly affected by BREXIT. Resources required to manage repercussions of this work stream are outlined below and have been approved by Ministers and the Treasury.

 

 

2017

2018

2019

Agriculture and fisheries

Backfill Director EMRE and AD Marine Resources

80k

80k

80k

 

Research and sector specific consultancy

40k

40k

40k

 

Travel and sub

5k

5k

5k

Total

 

125k

125k

125k

 

It should be noted that while there are significant opportunities for collaboration with HMG, there is also a need for diplomatic handling to ensure that areas of potential conflict between Jersey and UK objectives are appropriately managed. Funding will be used not only to enhance our reputation and ability to access markets but also to ensure our place in the multilateral trading system.

There was no requirement to draw down resources for Brexit in 2016, as this was met from Departmental budgets, on the basis that the amount of new work required in 2016 was minimal and could be dealt with within existing budget limits and staffing. In 2017, work streams are now much more expansive, detailed and demanding of time and money, requiring significant senior Officer time to be spent providing specialist advice within Government to Ministers and other officers, on the detail of the issues associated with the agriculture and fisheries work stream, but also in supporting policy development in other work streams, such as trade and services.

EDTSC is now in a position to draw down funds to commission consultancy and increase staff capacity in the areas of agriculture, fisheries, trade and services. This will both provide dedicated capacity to deliver Brexit priorities, but also free up capacity for existing specialist officers to dedicate to essential Brexit activity and coordination. Additional resources may be required as work stream business progresses.

In addition, detailed and extensive stakeholder consultation is required, which necessitates an ongoing dialogue across the arable sector, the dairy sector, capture fisheries, aquaculture and the up and down-stream businesses that support these sectors of the economy, such as merchants. This is time consuming work as it requires research and facilitation. There is also a requirement for scenario mapping in relation to the type and nature of Free Trade Agreements negotiated by HMG. This work is necessarily supported and coordinated by a specialist consultancy, which also has links into the Brexit process in the UK and as such provides the necessary scope and expertise.

There is a requirement for officers to travel to London as needed to meet with HMG Departments and other Crown Dependency officials at roundtable meetings on EU exit, which involves significant preparation, liaison and research.

Recommendation

The Minister to request draw down dedicated Brexit funding as described.

 

Written by:

Head of Service

 

 

Approved by: 

 

 

Ministerial Decision Case Ref:

26 Sept 2017

Back to top
rating button